\relax \newlabel{FirstPage}{{}{1}{}{}{}} \citation{Charged Higgs Theory} \citation{CDF Charged Higgs} \citation{D0 Charged Higgs} \citation{NNLO} \citation{alljet} \citation{d0det} \citation{alljet} \citation{PDG} \newlabel{sec:level1}{{I}{2}{}{}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {I}Introduction}{2}{}} \newlabel{sec:detector}{{II}{2}{}{}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {II}The D\O \ Detector}{2}{}} \newlabel{sec:objects}{{III}{2}{}{}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {III}Object Identification }{2}{}} \citation{tau ID} \citation{tau ID} \citation{bID} \citation{bID} \newlabel{sub:tau--ID}{{III\tmspace +\thinmuskip {.1667em}A}{3}{}{}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {A}$\tau $ ID}{3}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {1}Tau decay modes}{3}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {2}Tau ID variables}{3}{}} \newlabel{sec:svt}{{III\tmspace +\thinmuskip {.1667em}B}{3}{}{}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {B}The Secondary Vertex Tagging Algorithm }{3}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{\numberline {a}$b$-tagging efficiency}{3}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{\numberline {b}$c$-tagging efficiency}{3}{}} \citation{alpgen} \citation{pdf} \citation{pythia} \citation{evtgen} \citation{tauola} \citation{geant} \newlabel{backgrounds}{{IV}{4}{}{}{}} \@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {I}{\ignorespaces Background sources, relevant for the $\tau +jets$ analysis. The branching fraction into hadronic $\tau $ has been applied}}{4}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{\numberline {c}Light jet tagging efficiency}{4}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {IV}Backgrounds}{4}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {V}Event selection}{4}{}} \citation{metl} \citation{NNLO} \citation{W+4j} \citation{l+jets} \citation{l+jets} \newlabel{cap:metl}{{V\tmspace +\thinmuskip {.1667em}A}{5}{}{}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces $\not \tmspace -\thinmuskip {.1667em}\tmspace -\thinmuskip {.1667em} E_{T}$ significance for QCD-dominated data (black), $W+jets$ (blue) and $t\mathaccentV {bar}016{t}\rightarrow \tau +jets$ (red).}}{5}{}} \newlabel{cap:met_significance}{{1}{5}{}{}{}} \@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {II}{\ignorespaces Preselection results. Shown are the total acceptances (including preselection) and the number of events scaled to 349 $\pm $ 23 pb$^{-1}$ (no systematic uncertainties except for this luminosity error are included). The ALPGEN samples generation cuts are described in \cite {l+jets}. An estimate of QCD background not included.}}{5}{}} \newlabel{presel}{{II}{5}{}{}{}} \newlabel{sub:Preselection}{{V\tmspace +\thinmuskip {.1667em}A}{5}{}{}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {A}Preselection}{5}{}} \newlabel{sub:Results-of-the}{{V\tmspace +\thinmuskip {.1667em}B}{5}{}{}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {B}Results of the ID cuts}{5}{}} \@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {III}{\ignorespaces $b$-tagging and $\tau $ ID. In the MC, we use the $b$-tagging certified parameterization rather than actual $b$-tagging, that is, we applied the $b$-tagging weight. We also used the triggering weight as computed by the trigger efficiency parameterization.}}{6}{}} \newlabel{cap:btaggingandtau}{{III}{6}{}{}{}} \@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {IV}{\ignorespaces $b$-tagging and $\tau $ ID results. Shown are the total acceptances (including preselection) and the number of events scaled to 349 pb$^{-1}$. An estimate of QCD background is not included.}}{6}{}} \newlabel{b and tau}{{IV}{6}{}{}{}} \newlabel{sub:QCD-modeling}{{V\tmspace +\thinmuskip {.1667em}C}{6}{}{}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {C}QCD modeling}{6}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {1}Computing the QCD fraction}{6}{}} \@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {V}{\ignorespaces $b$-tagging and $\tau $ ID results per type after the $\eta $ cut (as explained in section V\tmspace +\thinmuskip {.1667em}C{}{}{}\hbox {}). Shown are the number of events predicted in signal and observed in the data. An estimate of QCD background is not included.}}{6}{}} \newlabel{b and tau (types) after eta}{{V}{6}{}{}{}} \citation{alljet} \citation{MLPfit} \citation{alljet} \citation{alljet} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Fit of the $\eta $ and $p_{T}$ distributions of the $\tau $ fake rate.}}{7}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces {Type 2 fit}}}{7}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces {Type 3 fit}}}{7}{}} \newlabel{cap:taufakerate_fit_types_noeta}{{2}{7}{}{}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces The 2D combined fit (in $\eta $ and $p_{T}$) of the $\tau $ fake rate.}}{7}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces {Type 2 2D fit}}}{7}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces {Type 3 2D Fit}}}{7}{}} \newlabel{cap:taufakerate_fit2D}{{3}{7}{}{}{}} \newlabel{sub:NN-variables}{{V\tmspace +\thinmuskip {.1667em}D}{7}{}{}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {D}Topological NN}{7}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Result of applying the NN cut. $t\mathaccentV {bar}016{t}$, $W$ and QCD are plotted incrementally in order to compare with the number of events observed in data. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties. $\sigma (t\mathaccentV {bar}016{t})=5.54$ pb is assumed. The right plot only shows the entries at high values of NN cut. }}{8}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces { Type 2 $\tau $ lepton}}}{8}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces { Type 2 $\tau $ lepton (zoomed)}}}{8}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(c)}{\ignorespaces { Type 3 $\tau $ lepton}}}{8}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(d)}{\ignorespaces { Type 3 $\tau $ lepton (zoomed)}}}{8}{}} \newlabel{cap:Result-of-applying}{{4}{8}{}{}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces $t\mathaccentV {bar}016{t}\rightarrow \tau +jets$ signal significance.}}{8}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces {Type\nobreakspace {}2}}}{8}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces {Type\nobreakspace {}3}}}{8}{}} \newlabel{signal-signifficance}{{5}{8}{}{}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {VI}Systematic uncertainties}{8}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {A}$b$-tagging}{8}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {VII}Cross section}{8}{}} \@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {VI}{\ignorespaces The final result summary after the $NN>0.9$ cut. $\epsilon (t\mathaccentV {bar}016{t})$ is the total signal acceptance. Uncertainties are statistical only.}}{8}{}} \newlabel{cap:RESULTS}{{VI}{8}{}{}{}} \citation{emu} \citation{alljet} \citation{NNLO} \citation{alljet} \citation{l+jets} \@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {VII}{\ignorespaces Systematic uncertainties on $\sigma (t\mathaccentV {bar}016{t})$ (in pb).}}{9}{}} \newlabel{cap:Syst}{{VII}{9}{}{}{}} \@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {VIII}{\ignorespaces $b$-tagging systematics sources}}{9}{}} \newlabel{cap:$b$ tagging-systematics-sources}{{VIII}{9}{}{}{}} \newlabel{sec:summary}{{VIII}{9}{}{}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {VIII}Summary }{9}{}} \bibcite{Charged Higgs Theory}{{1}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{CDF Charged Higgs}{{2}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{D0 Charged Higgs}{{3}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{NNLO}{{4}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{alljet}{{5}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{d0det}{{6}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{PDG}{{7}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{tau ID}{{8}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{bID}{{9}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{alpgen}{{10}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{pdf}{{11}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{pythia}{{12}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{evtgen}{{13}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{tauola}{{14}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{geant}{{15}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{l+jets}{{16}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{metl}{{17}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{W+4j}{{18}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{MLPfit}{{19}{}{{}}{{}}} \bibcite{emu}{{20}{}{{}}{{}}} \global \chardef \firstnote@num20\relax \global\NAT@numberstrue \bibstyle{apsrev} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {}Acknowledgments}{10}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {}References}{10}{}} \newlabel{LastBibItem}{{20}{10}{}{}{}} \@writefile{toc}{\appendix } \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {A}Kinematic Distributions}{10}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces 2 of the 5 input variables of the first topological NN before the NN cut ($\tau $ type 2). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) probabilities are shown, indicating the quality of the agreement.}}{10}{}} \newlabel{cap:The-nn0-input-small}{{6}{10}{}{}{}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces The resulting output of the second (final) NN ($\tau $ type 2).}}{10}{}} \newlabel{cap:The-resulting-output_type2}{{7}{10}{}{}{}} \newlabel{LastPage}{{}{10}} \@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces The resulting output of the second (final) NN ($\tau $ type 3).}}{11}{}} \newlabel{cap:The-resulting-output_type3}{{8}{11}{}{}{}}