|
version 1.1, 2011/05/18 21:30:39
|
version 1.2, 2011/06/01 01:20:54
|
|
Line 3
|
Line 3
|
| |
|
| In the next step we applied the requirements of tight $\tau$- and $b$-tagging. |
In the next step we applied the requirements of tight $\tau$- and $b$-tagging. |
| Table \ref{cap:btaggingandtau} shows the selection criteria that |
Table \ref{cap:btaggingandtau} shows the selection criteria that |
| we applied to data and MC. The b-tag operating point used was TIGHT, which corresponds |
we applied to data and MC. The $b$-tag operating point used was TIGHT, which corresponds |
| to NNbtag $>$ 0.775. We chose the $\tau$ with the highest $NN_{\tau}$ as \textit{the} $\tau$ candidate. |
to NNbtag $>$ 0.775. In there are more than 1 tau candidate in the event then we |
| |
choose the one with the highets $NN_{\tau}$ as the only one. Also we apply a tau-jet matching |
| |
condition. A tau candidate is only used in the measurement if the separation between it |
| |
and a jet is $\Delta R = \sqrt{{(\Delta \eta})^{2} + {(\Delta \phi})^{2}} > 0.5$. |
| At this stage of the analysis we separated the events dataset we deal with into parts, |
At this stage of the analysis we separated the events dataset we deal with into parts, |
| according to which type of $\tau$ the candidate with highest NN belongs. |
according to which type of $\tau$ the candidate with highest $NN_{\tau}$ belongs. |
| This was done primarily to separate the type 3 tau events (which are |
This was done primarily to separate the type 3 tau events (which are |
| expected to have much higher fake rate and thus weaker $\ttbar$ cross section result) from the |
expected to have much higher fake rate and thus weaker $\ttbar$ cross section result) from the |
| type 2 events. The separate measurement channels were later combined to get the final result |
type 2 events. The separate measurement channels were later combined to get the final result |
| (Section \ref{sub:xsect}). In principle, types 1 and 2 should be separated as well |
(Section \ref{sub:xsect}). In principle, types 1 and 2 should be separated as well |
| but as there exists a considerable |
but as there exists a considerable |
| cross-migration between them \cite{tau-id} and type 1 is a small fraction of |
cross-migration between them \cite{tau-id} and type 1 is a small fraction of |
| the total (10\% of type 1, 54.5\% of type 2 and 35.5\% of type 3), they were taken togetther in this analysis. |
the total (10\% of type 1, 54.5\% of type 2 and 35.5\% of type 3), they were taken together in this analysis. |
| The topological NN used to enhance the signal content is described in section \ref{sub:NN-variables} . |
The topological NN used to enhance the signal content is described in section \ref{sub:NN-variables} . |
| |
|
| %Table \ref{b and tau type 3} shows the same efficiencies for |
%Table \ref{b and tau type 3} shows the same efficiencies for |
|
Line 22 The topological NN used to enhance the s
|
Line 25 The topological NN used to enhance the s
|
| |
|
| |
|
| At this point, we used these ID algorithms to define 3 mutually exclusive and |
At this point, we used these ID algorithms to define 3 mutually exclusive and |
| exhastive subsamples out of the original preselected data sample: |
exhastive subsamples out of the preselected data sample: |
| |
|
| \begin{itemize} |
\begin{itemize} |
| \item The {}``non-$b$ veto'' or {}``signal'' sample - the $\tau$ candidate has $NN_{\tau}>0.90$ ($NN_{\tau}$ denotes the NN cut commonly applied to all taus) |
\item The {}``non-$b$-tag'' or {}``signal'' sample - The $\tau$ candidate has $NN_{\tau}>0.90$ |
| for taus types 1 and 2 and $NN(\tau)>0.95$ for taus type 3, and at least one NN b-tag (as in Table \ref{cap:btaggingandtau}). |
($NN_{\tau}$ denotes the NN cut commonly applied to all taus) |
| |
for taus types 1 and 2 and $NN_{\tau}>0.95$ for taus type 3, and at least one NN b-tag (as in Table \ref{cap:btaggingandtau}). |
| These $NN(\tau)$ cuts were chosen based on previous studies involving hadronic decays of taus \cite{tes,higgs_tau}. |
These $NN(\tau)$ cuts were chosen based on previous studies involving hadronic decays of taus \cite{tes,higgs_tau}. |
| This is the sample used to extract the cross section. Jets matched to $\tau$ candidates are not $b$-tagged, |
This is the sample used to extract the cross section. Jets matched to $\tau$ candidates are not $b$-tagged, |
| althought they still count as jets. |
althought they still count as jets. |
|
Line 34 althought they still count as jets.
|
Line 38 althought they still count as jets.
|
| $0.3<NN_{\tau}<0.7$ for all taus. $\tau$ NN lower cut of 0.3 |
$0.3<NN_{\tau}<0.7$ for all taus. $\tau$ NN lower cut of 0.3 |
| instead of 0.0 was chosen to bias their jet properties closer to those of tight tau candidates, |
instead of 0.0 was chosen to bias their jet properties closer to those of tight tau candidates, |
| in particular, so they have narrow showers. The upper cut is at 0.7 and not 0.95 or 0.90 to reduce signal contamination. |
in particular, so they have narrow showers. The upper cut is at 0.7 and not 0.95 or 0.90 to reduce signal contamination. |
| In this sample, 1400000 events were used for NN training for taus type 1 and 2 and 600000 events were used |
In this sample, 1400000 events were used for NN training for taus of Type 1 and 2 and 600000 events were used |
| in the case of type 3 taus. In both cases, the rest of the samples served as QCD template. |
in the case of Type 3 taus. In both cases, the rest of the samples served as QCD template. |
| \item The {}``$b$ veto'' sample - Require exactly 0 tight $b$-tags. This is |
\item The {}``$b$ veto'' sample - Require exactly 0 tight $b$-tags. This is |
| the control sample used to verify the validity of the QCD modelling method. The b veto requirement |
the control sample used to validate of the QCD modelling method. The b veto requirement |
| implies this sample is almost purely background. |
implies this sample is almost purely background. |
| \end{itemize} |
\end{itemize} |
| % |
% |
| |
|
| Along with the $NN_{\tau}$ |
One extra cut applied along with the $NN_{\tau}$ |
| cut described above, we also applied the cut NNelec $>$ 0.9 only |
cut described above was the so called NNelec cut. It is meant to be applied to Type 2 taus only in order |
| to type 2 taus since these are more likely to be faked by electrons. The cut NNelec $>$ 0.9 was chosen in |
to reduce the probability of having these being faked by electrons. We chose a non-optimized cut of NNelec $>$ 0.9. |
| order to match the lowest cut of $NN_{\tau}$ $>$ 0.9 applied to type 2 taus (Section \ref{sub:Results-of-the}). |
|
| |
|
| As both b and $\tau$ ID is the step immediately after the preselection, the number of events available is |
As both b and $\tau$ ID is the step immediately after the preselection, the number of events available is |
| 2800000 million events. As explained above 1400000 events were used for taus type 1 and 2 NN training |
2800000 events. As explained above 1400000 events were used for taus of Type 1 and 2 NN training |
| and 600000 for type 3 taus NN training. Thus, there are 1400000 events available in each sample for the |
and 600000 for Type 3 taus NN training. Thus, there are 1400000 events available in each sample for the |
| measurement in the case of types 1 and 2 and 2200000 in the case of type 3. Details on NN training are given |
measurement in the case of Types 1 and 2 and 2200000 in the case of Type 3. Details of NN training are given |
| in Section \ref{sub:NN-variables}. |
in Section \ref{sub:NN-variables}. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Line 66 know whether this sample is totally QCD
|
Line 69 know whether this sample is totally QCD
|
| Numbers showing the composition of such sample are shown on Tables \ref{loosetight1_2} and \ref{loosetight_3} |
Numbers showing the composition of such sample are shown on Tables \ref{loosetight1_2} and \ref{loosetight_3} |
| with their respective statistical uncertainties. From the $t\bar{t}$ content in each case we are able |
with their respective statistical uncertainties. From the $t\bar{t}$ content in each case we are able |
| estimate the signal contamination in the loose-tight sample. Such contaminations are 5.4\% |
estimate the signal contamination in the loose-tight sample. Such contaminations are 5.4\% |
| and 3.0\% for taus type 1 and 2 and type 3 respectively when a cross section of 7.46 pb is assumed |
and 3.0\% for taus of Type 1 and 2 and Type 3 respectively when $\sigma_{t\bar{t}}$ = 7.46 pb is assumed |
| (Section \ref{sub:mcsample}). Likewise we see that electroweak contaminations |
(Section \ref{sub:mcsample}). Likewise we see that electroweak contaminations |
| are 2.2\% and 0.9\%. As this is the sample used to model the QCD background |
are 2.2\% and 0.9\%. As this is the sample used to model the QCD background |
| both signal and electroweak contaminations were taken into account when measuring the |
both signal and electroweak contaminations were taken into account when measuring the |
|
Line 96 cross section in Section \ref{sub:xsect}
|
Line 99 cross section in Section \ref{sub:xsect}
|
| \caption{$b$-tagging and $\tau$ ID. In the MC, we use the $b$-tagging certified |
\caption{$b$-tagging and $\tau$ ID. In the MC, we use the $b$-tagging certified |
| parameterization rather than actual $b$-tagging, that is, we applied the |
parameterization rather than actual $b$-tagging, that is, we applied the |
| $b$-tagging weight. We also used the triggering weight |
$b$-tagging weight. We also used the triggering weight |
| as computed by the trigger efficiency parameterization as well as luminosity profile and $PV_Z$ reweighting weights. $ |
as computed by the trigger efficiency parameterization as well as luminosity profile, $PV_Z$ reweighting |
| mcweight$ is the MC normalization factors (to luminosity), which are different for MC |
and $WZPt$ reweighting weights. $mcweight$ is the MC normalization factor (to luminosity), which is different for MC |
| samples with different parton multiplicities in ALPGEN MC samples.}%\end{ruledtabular} |
samples with different parton multiplicities in ALPGEN MC samples.}%\end{ruledtabular} |
| \label{cap:btaggingandtau} |
\label{cap:btaggingandtau} |
| \end{table} |
\end{table} |
|
Line 136 $Wcc+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+cc+jets$&
|
Line 139 $Wcc+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+cc+jets$&
|
| $Wjj+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+jj+jets$& |
$Wjj+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 5.66 $\pm$ 0.11 \\ |
5.66 $\pm$ 0.11 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.93 $\pm$ 0.08\\ |
0.93 $\pm$ 0.08\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.51 $\pm$ 0.04\\ |
0.51 $\pm$ 0.04\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 1.07 $\pm$ 0.10 \\ |
1.07 $\pm$ 0.10 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.03 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
0.03 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.00 $\pm$ 0.00\\ |
0.00 $\pm$ 0.00\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.02 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
0.02 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.07 $\pm$ 0.02\\ |
0.07 $\pm$ 0.02\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.02 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
0.02 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.01 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
0.01 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+bb+jets$& |
$Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+bb+jets$& |
|
Line 173 $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+jj+jets$&
|
Line 176 $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+jj+jets$&
|
| & |
& |
| 0.04 $\pm$ 0.01\\ \hline |
0.04 $\pm$ 0.01\\ \hline |
| \end{tabular} |
\end{tabular} |
| \caption{Final number of events in each channel for taus types 1 and 2 $\tau$ after b-tagging, $\tau$ ID and trigger |
\caption{Final number of events in each channel for taus of Types 1 and 2 $\tau$ after b-tagging, $\tau$ ID and trigger |
| in the signal sample when the assumed cross section is 7.46 pb. An estimate of QCD background is not included.} |
in the signal sample when $\sigma_{t\bar{t}}$ = 7.46 pb is assumed. An estimate of QCD background is not included.} |
| %\end{ruledtabular} |
%\end{ruledtabular} |
| \label{b_and_tau_type1_2} |
\label{b_and_tau_type1_2} |
| \end{table} |
\end{table} |
|
Line 213 $Wcc+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+cc+jets$&
|
Line 216 $Wcc+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+cc+jets$&
|
| $Wjj+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+jj+jets$& |
$Wjj+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 4.08 $\pm$ 0.11\\ |
4.08 $\pm$ 0.11\\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.74 $\pm$ 0.07\\ |
0.74 $\pm$ 0.07\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.41 $\pm$ 0.03\\ |
0.41 $\pm$ 0.03\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.80 $\pm$ 0.10 \\ |
0.80 $\pm$ 0.10 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.00 $\pm$ 0.00\\ |
0.00 $\pm$ 0.00\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.01 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
0.01 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.01 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
0.01 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.04 $\pm$ 0.02\\ |
0.04 $\pm$ 0.02\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.01 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
0.01 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.00 $\pm$ 0.00 \\ |
0.00 $\pm$ 0.00 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+bb+jets$& |
$Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+bb+jets$& |
|
Line 250 $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+jj+jets$&
|
Line 253 $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+jj+jets$&
|
| & |
& |
| 0.06 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ \hline |
0.06 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ \hline |
| \end{tabular} |
\end{tabular} |
| \caption{Final number of events in each channel for taus type 3 $\tau$ After b-tagging, $\tau$ ID and trigger |
\caption{Final number of events in each channel for taus Type 3 $\tau$ After b-tagging, $\tau$ ID and trigger |
| in the signal sample when the assumed cross section is 7.46 pb. An estimate of QCD background is not included.}%\end{ruledtabular} |
in the signal sample when $\sigma_{t\bar{t}}$ = 7.46 pb is assumed. An estimate of QCD background is not included.}%\end{ruledtabular} |
| \label{b_and_tau_type_3} |
\label{b_and_tau_type_3} |
| \end{table} |
\end{table} |
| |
|
|
Line 288 $Wcc+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+cc+jets$&
|
Line 291 $Wcc+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+cc+jets$&
|
| $Wjj+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+jj+jets$& |
$Wjj+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 169.95 $\pm$ 2.68\\ |
169.95 $\pm$ 2.68\\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 1.30 $\pm$ 0.11\\ |
1.30 $\pm$ 0.11\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 3.15 $\pm$ 0.20\\ |
3.15 $\pm$ 0.20\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 16.86 $\pm$ 1.14 \\ |
16.86 $\pm$ 1.14 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.02 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
0.02 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.00 $\pm$ 0.00\\ |
0.00 $\pm$ 0.00\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.74 $\pm$ 0.33 \\ |
0.74 $\pm$ 0.33 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.08 $\pm$ 0.02\\ |
0.08 $\pm$ 0.02\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.07 $\pm$ 0.03\\ |
0.07 $\pm$ 0.03\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.38 $\pm$ 0.22 \\ |
0.38 $\pm$ 0.22 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+bb+jets$& |
$Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+bb+jets$& |
|
Line 325 $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+jj+jets$&
|
Line 328 $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+jj+jets$&
|
| & |
& |
| 1.36 $\pm$ 0.49 \\ \hline |
1.36 $\pm$ 0.49 \\ \hline |
| \end{tabular} |
\end{tabular} |
| \caption{$b$-veto data set composition for types 1 and 2 $\tau$ when the assumed cross section is 7.46 pb.}%\end{ruledtabular} |
\caption{$b$-veto data set composition for Types 1 and 2 $\tau$ when $\sigma_{t\bar{t}}$ = 7.46 pb is assumed.}%\end{ruledtabular} |
| \label{bveto_type1_2} |
\label{bveto_type1_2} |
| \end{table} |
\end{table} |
| |
|
|
Line 362 $Wcc+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+cc+jets$&
|
Line 365 $Wcc+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+cc+jets$&
|
| $Wjj+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+jj+jets$& |
$Wjj+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 126.41 $\pm$ 2.60 \\ |
126.41 $\pm$ 2.60 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.92 $\pm$ 0.09\\ |
0.92 $\pm$ 0.09\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 2.86 $\pm$ 0.20\\ |
2.86 $\pm$ 0.20\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 14.53 $\pm$ 1.15 \\ |
14.53 $\pm$ 1.15 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.00 $\pm$ 0.00\\ |
0.00 $\pm$ 0.00\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.08 $\pm$ 0.04\\ |
0.08 $\pm$ 0.04\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.31 $\pm$ 0.18 \\ |
0.31 $\pm$ 0.18 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.04 $\pm$ 0.02\\ |
0.04 $\pm$ 0.02\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.05 $\pm$ 0.02\\ |
0.05 $\pm$ 0.02\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.05 $\pm$ 0.04 \\ |
0.05 $\pm$ 0.04 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+bb+jets$& |
$Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+bb+jets$& |
|
Line 400 $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+jj+jets$&
|
Line 403 $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+jj+jets$&
|
| 2.31 $\pm$ 0.46 \\ \hline |
2.31 $\pm$ 0.46 \\ \hline |
| \end{tabular} |
\end{tabular} |
| %\end{ruledtabular} |
%\end{ruledtabular} |
| \caption{$b$-veto data set composition for type 3 $\tau$ when the assumed cross section is 7.46 pb.} |
\caption{$b$-veto data set composition for Type 3 $\tau$ when $\sigma_{t\bar{t}}$ = 7.46 pb is assumed.} |
| \label{b_veto_type_3} |
\label{b_veto_type_3} |
| \end{table} |
\end{table} |
| |
|
|
Line 436 $Wcc+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+cc+jets$&
|
Line 439 $Wcc+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+cc+jets$&
|
| $Wjj+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+jj+jets$& |
$Wjj+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 11.34 $\pm$ 0.26\\ |
11.34 $\pm$ 0.26\\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.50 $\pm$ 0.06\\ |
0.50 $\pm$ 0.06\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.58 $\pm$ 0.06\\ |
0.58 $\pm$ 0.06\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 1.10 $\pm$ 0.13 \\ |
1.10 $\pm$ 0.13 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.01 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
0.01 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.01 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
0.01 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.00 $\pm$ 0.00 \\ |
0.00 $\pm$ 0.00 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.03 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
0.03 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.04 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
0.04 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.02 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
0.02 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+bb+jets$& |
$Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+bb+jets$& |
|
Line 473 $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+jj+jets$&
|
Line 476 $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+jj+jets$&
|
| & |
& |
| 0.36 $\pm$ 0.04 \\ \hline |
0.36 $\pm$ 0.04 \\ \hline |
| \end{tabular} |
\end{tabular} |
| \caption{loose-tight data set composition for types 1 and 2 $\tau$ when the assumed cross section is 7.46 pb.}%\end{ruledtabular} |
\caption{loose-tight data set composition for Types 1 and 2 $\tau$ when $\sigma_{t\bar{t}}$ = 7.46 pb is assumed.}%\end{ruledtabular} |
| \label{loosetight1_2} |
\label{loosetight1_2} |
| \end{table} |
\end{table} |
| |
|
|
Line 511 $Wcc+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+cc+jets$&
|
Line 514 $Wcc+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+cc+jets$&
|
| $Wjj+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+jj+jets$& |
$Wjj+jets\rightarrow$ $l\nu+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 16.32 $\pm$ 0.30 \\ |
16.32 $\pm$ 0.30 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.52 $\pm$ 0.05\\ |
0.52 $\pm$ 0.05\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.46 $\pm$ 0.04\\ |
0.46 $\pm$ 0.04\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\tau\tau+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 1.16 $\pm$ 0.12 \\ |
1.16 $\pm$ 0.12 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.00 $\pm$ 0.00\\ |
0.00 $\pm$ 0.00\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.00 $\pm$ 0.00\\ |
0.00 $\pm$ 0.00\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $ee+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.01 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
0.01 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+bb+jets$& |
$\gamma Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+bb+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.06 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
0.06 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
| $Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+cc+jets$& |
$\gamma Zcc+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+cc+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.07 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
0.07 $\pm$ 0.01\\ |
| $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+jj+jets$& |
$\gamma Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\mu\mu+jj+jets$& |
| & |
& |
| 0.11 $\pm$ 0.02 \\ |
0.11 $\pm$ 0.02 \\ |
| $Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+bb+jets$& |
$Zbb+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+bb+jets$& |
|
Line 549 $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+jj+jets$&
|
Line 552 $Zjj+jets\rightarrow$ $\nu\nu+jj+jets$&
|
| 1.28 $\pm$ 0.08 \\ \hline |
1.28 $\pm$ 0.08 \\ \hline |
| \end{tabular} |
\end{tabular} |
| %\end{ruledtabular} |
%\end{ruledtabular} |
| \caption{loose-tight data set composition for type 3 $\tau$ when the assumed cross section is 7.46 pb.} |
\caption{loose-tight data set composition for Type 3 $\tau$ when $\sigma_{t\bar{t}}$ = 7.46 pb is assumed.} |
| \label{loosetight_3} |
\label{loosetight_3} |
| \end{table} |
\end{table} |
| |
|
![[BACK]](/icons/small/back.gif){kind=icon}
Return to b_and_tau.tex CVS log ![[TXT]](/icons/small/text.gif){kind=icon}
![[DIR]](/icons/small/dir.gif){kind=icon}
Up to [Nicadd] / ttbar / p20_taujets_note