Annotation of ttbar/p20_taujets_note/Topological.tex, revision 1.2
1.1 uid12904 1: \newpage
2:
3: \section{\label{sub:Topo}Topological variables}
4:
1.2 ! uid12904 5: In this section we show distributions of the topological variables used in this analysis in order to
! 6: check the agreement between data and Monte Carlo in all cases. Plots are separated into two sets:
1.1 uid12904 7: signal sample and b-veto control plots.
8:
9: \subsection{\label{sub:signalplots}Signal sample plots}
10:
11: As stated in Section \ref{sub:Results-of-the} the signal sample is the one we used to perform
12: the measurement. The cuts here consist of $NN(\tau)>0.90$ for taus types 1 and 2,
13: $NN(\tau)>0.95$ for taus type 3, and at least one NN b-tag. This sample contains
14: a good amount of $t\bar{t}$ (19.7\% for types 1 and 2 and 8.6\% for type 3) as shown in Tables
15: \ref{b_and_tau_type1_2} and \ref{b_and_tau_type_3}. Next we show the plots of
16: the topological variables for this sample. The error bars represent the statistical uncertainties only.
17:
18: \begin{figure}[h]
19: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeI_II/aplan}
20: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeI_II/ht}
21: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeI_II/cent}
22: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeI_II/spher}
23:
24: \caption{The topological variables in the signal sample
25: ($\tau$ types 1 and 2). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) probabilities are shown,
26: indicating the level of agreement.}
27:
28: %\label{fig:variables_type2_Std}
29: \end{figure}
30:
31: \newpage
32:
33: \begin{figure}[t]
34: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeI_II/sqrts}
35: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeI_II/costhetastar}
36: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeI_II/metl}
37: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeI_II/met}
38:
39: \caption{The topological variables in the signal sample
40: ($\tau$ types 1 and 2). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) probabilities are shown,
41: indicating the level of agreement.}
42: %\label{fig:variables_type2_Std}
43: \end{figure}
44:
45:
46: \begin{figure}[b]
47: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeIII/aplan}
48: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeIII/ht}
49: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeIII/cent}
50: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeIII/spher}
51:
52: \caption{The topological variables in the signal sample
53: ($\tau$ types 3). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) probabilities are shown,
54: indicating the level of agreement.}
55: %\label{fig:variables_type2_Std}
56: \end{figure}
57:
58: \begin{figure}[t]
59: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeIII/sqrts}
60: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeIII/costhetastar}
61: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeIII/metl}
62: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/Std_TypeIII/met}
63:
64: \caption{The topological variables in the signal sample
65: ($\tau$ types 3). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) probabilities are shown,
66: indicating the level of agreement.}
67: %\label{fig:variables_type2_Std}
68: \end{figure}
69:
70: \clearpage
71:
72: \subsection{\label{sub:signalplots}b-veto control sample plots}
73:
74: The b-veto sample is the one used to test our QCD modelling \ref{sub:Results-of-the}. As it requires no
75: NN b-tags it is QCD-dominated and has a tiny amount of $t\bar{t}$ (1.9\% for types 1 and 2 and 0.7\% for type 3)
76: as shown in Tables \ref{bveto_type1_2} and \ref{b_veto_type_3}. It consists of an ideal sample to make sure
77: that the QCD modelling works and can be used in the measurement. Next we show the plots of
78: the topological variables for this sample. The error bars represent the statistical uncertainties only.
79:
80: \begin{figure}[h]
81: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeI_II/aplan}
82: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeI_II/ht}
83: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeI_II/cent}
84: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeI_II/spher}
85:
86: \caption{The topological variables in the b-veto control sample
87: ($\tau$ types 1 and 2). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) probabilities are shown,
88: indicating how good the agreement is.}
89:
90: %\label{fig:variables_type2_bveto}
91: \end{figure}
92:
93: \newpage
94:
95: \begin{figure}[t]
96: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeI_II/sqrts}
97: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeI_II/costhetastar}
98: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeI_II/metl}
99: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeI_II/met}
100:
101: \caption{The topological variables in the b-veto control sample
102: ($\tau$ types 1 and 2). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) probabilities are shown,
103: indicating how good the agreement is.}
104:
105: %\label{fig:variables_type2_bveto}
106: \end{figure}
107:
108: \begin{figure}[b]
109: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeIII/aplan}
110: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeIII/ht}
111: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeIII/cent}
112: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeIII/spher}
113:
114: \caption{The topological variables in the b-veto control sample
115: ($\tau$ types 3). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) probabilities are shown,
116: indicating how good the agreement is.}
117:
118: %\label{fig:variables_type2_bveto}
119: \end{figure}
120:
121:
122: \begin{figure}[t]
123: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeIII/sqrts}
124: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeIII/costhetastar}
125: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeIII/metl}
126: \includegraphics[scale=0.34]{CONTROLPLOTS/bveto_TypeIII/met}
127:
128: \caption{The topological variables in the b-veto control sample
129: ($\tau$ types 3). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) probabilities are shown,
130: indicating how good the agreement is.}
131:
132: %\label{fig:variables_type2_bveto}
133: \end{figure}
134:
135: \clearpage
136:
FreeBSD-CVSweb <freebsd-cvsweb@FreeBSD.org>