WINDOW #1 results are here:

WINDOW #2
 

FEA

Comparison of Photogrammetry with FEA 
50 psi
80 psi

 
Question of pressure reference addressed
50psi (or 36psi?)

 

COMPARISON

Comparison of photogrammetry with strain gage data  f(radius)
60 psi
70 psi
80 psi
90 psi
100 psi

 

STRAIN GAGE DATA

Plot of Microstrain vs applied stress
Uniaxial at 10mm
Rosette at 12mm
Rosette at 31mm
Uniaxials (3) at 44mm
Rosette at 74mm
Uniaxials (3) at 87mm
Rosette at 119mm
Uniaxials (3) at 132mm
All gages

 
Strain/pressure vs time - illustrates yield 
Illustration of yield

 

PHOTOGRAMMETRY DATA

Delta y vs radius
0 psi #1
50 psi #1
0 psi #2
50 psi #2
0 psi #3
50 psi #3
0 psi #4
50 psi #4
0 psi #5
50 psi #5
0 psi #6
60 psi
0 psi #7
70 psi
0 psi #8
80 psi
0 psi #9
90 psi
0 psi #10
100 psi
0 psi #11
110 psi
0 psi #12
120 psi

 
Delta y vs pressure
Projected + fixed targets
Fixed targets only
Fixed targets (zoom)

 
Evidence/examples of projected target movement
x position vs time (1 target)
x positon vs time (2 targets)
z position vs time (1 target)
z postion vs time (2 targets)

 
Data as f(azimuth) WINDOW 2 
delta y vs radius, 50 PSI 

 

WINDOW #1
This subset of WINDOW #1 results is presented here to address the effect of the strain gages on the strength of the window


Data as f(azimuth) WINDOW 1
Delta y vs radius, 17 psi, before yield
Delta y vs radius, 29.2 psi, near yield
Delta y vs radius, 31.2 psi, after yield
Delta y vs radius, 36.17 psi, just before rupture